Paste your resume and (optionally) the job description to check ATS compatibility. 100% free, runs in your browser — nothing is uploaded.
Get 100+ AI prompts for resume writing, cover letters, interview prep, salary negotiation, and more.
Get the Job Search AI Toolkit — $12Curious how this tool compares? Read my test of 8 ATS scanners with the same resume — scores ranged 54 to 91, and the one edit that moved every grader.
An Applicant Tracking System (ATS) is the software an employer uses to collect, parse, and rank applications before a human ever opens them. When it parses your resume it pulls your text out of the file, tries to sort it into sections — contact, experience, education, skills — and checks how well it matches the job. If the parser can't find your work history because it's trapped in a table or a two-column graphic layout, that content effectively disappears. This ATS score checker mirrors those parse-and-rank steps so you can see the structural problems before a recruiter's system does, without paying for a scan or handing your resume to a third party.
The score is built from eight structural signals plus an optional keyword match. Each one maps to something real parsers care about:
Paste a job description into the second box and the tool also extracts the most frequent role keywords and bigrams, then shows which ones your resume already contains and which are missing — keyword match is the single factor most ATS platforms weight highest.
On this checker, 75 and above means strong compatibility, 50–74 means it will parse but has gaps worth fixing, and under 50 means the parser is probably losing whole sections. Treat that number as a diagnostic, not a grade: there is no universal ATS score. When I ran a single resume through eight different ATS scanners the scores ranged from 54 to 91 for the exact same document. The value is in the checks the tools agree on — a buried timeline, a missing section header, zero metrics — not in chasing any one vendor's number.
The highest-return edits are almost always structural, not stylistic. Move email and phone to the very top. Replace any two-column or table layout with a single column of plain text under standard headings. Turn duty lines into verb-led bullets and attach a number to at least a few of them. Then mirror the exact wording of the target job — if the posting says "stakeholder management," don't write "worked with teams." Recruiters skim, and a reader who barely reads needs the important parts where they expect them; the same clean structure that helps the parser also helps the human. Federal roles are the strictest example — USAJOBS requires explicit start and end dates and standard sections or the application is rejected outright.
On this checker, 75 or above means strong ATS compatibility, 50–74 means it will parse but needs work, and below 50 means the parser is likely dropping or mangling sections. There is no single official ATS score — every vendor weights things differently — so treat any score as a diagnostic of structure, not a verdict.
No. The whole analysis runs in your browser with JavaScript. Your resume text is never sent to a server, saved, or logged — you can disconnect from the internet after the page loads and it still works.
Use standard section headings (Experience, Education, Skills, Summary), keep it to one or two columns of plain text with no tables or graphics, put email and phone at the top, lead bullets with action verbs, tie achievements to numbers, and mirror the exact keywords from the job description you are targeting.
Most mid-to-large employers do, and nearly all Fortune 500 companies. Small businesses and some startups still read resumes by hand, but building for the ATS never hurts a human reader — clean structure and clear headings help both.
Because each tool uses its own parser and its own weighting. When I ran one resume through eight scanners the scores ranged from 54 to 91. Use the score to find structural problems the checkers agree on, not as an absolute grade.